# Global Referendum Strategy

Politicians can ignore protests. They can ignore polls. They can ignore reality for surprisingly long periods (see: climate change, 1970-present).

They cannot ignore [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) cryptographically verified humans saying “do this thing or we vote you out.”

Not because they care about those humans. Because they can count.

But the politicians are the secondary audience. The primary audience is you. Right now every human who thinks “obviously we should spend less on murder and more on medicine” also thinks they are the only one. They are not the only one. They are almost everyone. The referendum is the moment [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) humans look up and realize they are [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) humans. That is not a petition. That is a species finding out what it actually wants.

The **International Campaign to End War and Disease** (the Campaign) is the public coalition of humans and organizations signing the [1% Treaty](https://manual.warondisease.org/knowledge/solution/1-percent-treaty.html)^([1](../references.llms.md#ref-1-percent-treaty-paper-2025)) ^([2](../references.llms.md#ref-1-pct-treaty-impact-paper-2025)) before governments do. The referendum is its public signature layer. Humans are not passive recipients of policy here. They are creating the consent record that governments, courts, funders, and treaty negotiators must answer.

![Ants marching in a circular death spiral](../../assets/images/unrepresentative-democracy/ant-death-spiral.gif)

Army ants follow pheromone trails. When the trail loops back on itself, they march in a circle until they die. Your species does the same thing with the belief that “nobody supports this.” The referendum breaks the loop. ([Clemzouzou69](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ant_mill.gif), CC BY-SA 4.0)

## What You’re Actually Building

### The Goal

A public treaty register where people say “please stop letting me die of stupid things” in a way that lawyers find convincing.

[![The five things you need for a global referendum that politicians can’t ignore: real votes, secret votes, fair votes, visible votes, and viral growth.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-the-goal-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-the-goal-bw-academic.jpg)

The five things you need for a global referendum that politicians can’t ignore: real votes, secret votes, fair votes, visible votes, and viral growth.

You should not need a website for this. You should be able to say “please stop letting me die of stupid things” and then someone would stop letting you die of stupid things. On your planet, this requires cryptographic verification, because your species lies about everything, including whether it wants to be alive. You need mathematical proof that people prefer living. Think about that sentence for a moment. You have built a civilization where “I don’t want to die” requires a receipt.

Requirements: the public signatures have to be real (auditable), the votes have to be secret (privacy-preserving), the system has to work for everyone including people without bank accounts or government IDs (which is most of Earth, a fact that surprises the people with bank accounts), the code has to be open-source so anyone can audit it, and the whole thing has to grow fast enough to matter before your species gets distracted by a new television show.

Target: **[51.6% (90% CI: 50.5%-52.7%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_target_pct) of humanity** ([4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters)+ verified public signatures). That is the canonical public coordination target in the prize model. The old Chenoweth-style [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) threshold is useful as a historical lower bound for when movements become hard to ignore, not as the end-state goal here.

## The Voting System

The system uses end-to-end verifiable cryptography. Each voter gets a receipt that proves they voted, without proving how they voted. This is called a “zero-knowledge proof,” which sounds like something a philosophy student made up during an exam they didn’t study for, but it’s real mathematics, and it works, and politicians cannot argue with it. Several have tried. The math won every time. Math is undefeated against politicians, which is the only undefeated record in your species’ history.

[![Your vote gets encrypted, mixed with everyone else’s votes like a cryptographic smoothie, then posted publicly. You can verify yours; nobody knows it’s yours.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-end-to-end-verifiable-system-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-end-to-end-verifiable-system-bw-academic.jpg)

Your vote gets encrypted, mixed with everyone else’s votes like a cryptographic smoothie, then posted publicly. You can verify yours; nobody knows it’s yours.

Every public signature is counted. Every ballot is published anonymized. Biometric data never leaves your device. All code open-source. The system is designed so that even the people running it can’t see how you voted, which makes it more private than your actual elections, where the voting booth has a curtain that stops two feet off the ground and the poll worker is definitely looking at your shoes.

## On Stopping People from Cheating

Your species has been cheating at democracy since you invented it. The Athenians had ballot-stuffing. The Romans had vote-buying. Americans have gerrymandering, which is the practice of drawing voting districts in shapes that look like someone dropped a plate of spaghetti on a map and then legally required it.

Three verification layers. Because one has never been enough for you.

[![Layer 1: Are you human? Layer 2: Are you a real human? Layer 3: Are you a real human who hasn’t voted already?](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-verification-layers-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-verification-layers-bw-academic.jpg)

Layer 1: Are you human? Layer 2: Are you a real human? Layer 3: Are you a real human who hasn’t voted already?

**Layer 1** is the bouncer at the door. Email and phone verification, device fingerprinting, IP geolocation. Stops about 90% of fraud, which is the lazy fraud, which is most fraud, because cheating, like everything else your species does, follows a power law where most of the cheating is done by amateurs who give up if you ask them to verify their phone number. This is the “are you a human” layer. The bar is low. The fact that it catches 90% of attempts tells you something about the sophistication of your average cheater.

**Layer 2** is the VIP section. Government e-ID integration (Estonia^([3](../references.llms.md#ref-estonia-eresidency-stats)), India’s Aadhaar^([4](../references.llms.md#ref-indian-aadhaar-system)), EU eIDAS^([5](../references.llms.md#ref-eu-eidas-network)), US via ID.me^([6](../references.llms.md#ref-id-me-verification))), biometric liveness detection (blink at the camera to prove you’re not a photograph, which is a sentence that would confuse every human who lived before 2010), and proof-of-uniqueness partners like Worldcoin^([7](../references.llms.md#ref-worldcoin-scale)), BrightID^([8](../references.llms.md#ref-brightid-social-verification-network)), and Gitcoin Passport^([9](../references.llms.md#ref-gitcoin-passport)). Higher trust, higher rewards. This is the “are you a specific human who hasn’t already voted as a different specific human” layer.

**Layer 3** is for the billions of humans who don’t exist in any database because their governments can’t be bothered to write down that they’re alive. Community attestation: your neighbors confirm you’re real. This works because lying to a computer is easy but lying to a room full of people who watched you eat breakfast is hard.

Even Layer 1 gets you counted. You don’t need a passport to say “I would prefer not to die.” AI fraud detection: over 99% detection, under 1% false positives. Biometric data stays on your device, encrypted with keys you control. Compliant with GDPR^([10](../references.llms.md#ref-gdpr-biometric-data)), CCPA/CPRA^([11](../references.llms.md#ref-ccpa-cpra-compliance)), BIPA^([12](../references.llms.md#ref-illinois-bipa)), and COPPA^([13](../references.llms.md#ref-coppa-compliance)). Four different laws from four different places that all say “don’t be creepy with people’s data” using four different definitions of “creepy” and four different penalty structures for being creepy in the wrong jurisdiction. Your species regulates privacy the way it does everything: redundantly, inconsistently, and with great confidence.

## Growth Strategy

Your species downloaded TikTok over 4 billion times to watch strangers twerk. Getting [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) to click “yes” on not dying should be easier. It isn’t, because not dying is less entertaining than twerking, but it should be, and that gap between “should be” and “isn’t” is the entire marketing problem.

Each person who signs the public treaty register gets a small referral bonus for bringing the next, funded by [Incentive Alignment Bonds](../../knowledge/solution/incentive-alignment-bonds.llms.md)^([14](../references.llms.md#ref-iab-paper-2025)). The modeled blended activation cost is [\$6.5 (90% CI: \$4-\$9.14)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_activation_cost_per_participant) per verified participant. For comparison, acquiring a coffee customer costs \$5-15. Nike pays \$40 to get one person to buy shoes online. You’re trying to convince someone to support not dying for less than the cost of a cheap online acquisition. The fact that “not dying” needs a financial incentive to compete with shoes tells you everything about your species that this manual has been trying to tell you. But here we are.

[![Getting someone to support ending disease: \$0.75. Getting someone to buy shoes online: \$40. You’ve been spending marketing money wrong.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-the-money-part-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-the-money-part-bw-academic.jpg)

Getting someone to support ending disease: \$0.75. Getting someone to buy shoes online: \$40. You’ve been spending marketing money wrong.

The cheapest wearable surface for the referral link is a shirt. The operational details (seed threshold, cost per seed wearer, foundation assurance contract) live in [The Funniest Joke in the Universe](../../knowledge/appendix/joke.llms.md).

## Integrity (Proving You Didn’t Cheat)

Your species accuses people of cheating at everything, including children’s football, baking competitions, and board games at Thanksgiving. The Thanksgiving ones start wars that last longer than the actual wars in your history books. A Global Referendum with actual stakes will face accusations that make your election audits look like casual suggestions.

The defense: make cheating mathematically impossible, then publish the math. NGO and academic observers get read-only dashboards with real-time fraud detection. You can’t argue with a zero-knowledge proof. You can argue with a person. You can argue with a committee. You can’t argue with math. Math doesn’t have feelings. Math doesn’t have an election coming up. Math just sits there being correct, which makes it the only trustworthy participant in your democratic process.

Participants complete structured learning paths before voting. Higher reward tiers open as you learn more. This produces informed participants instead of confused button-clickers, though confused button-clickers who want to not die are also welcome. An uninformed person who clicks “don’t let me die” is still more useful than an informed person who clicks nothing, and your planet has a surplus of informed people clicking nothing. You call them “academics.”

Legal positioning: non-binding global consultation and public treaty register with country-specific bridges to official mechanisms where feasible. A public signature is not a formal state signature. It does not create Article I funding obligations. It creates democratic consent, Court legitimacy, and political pressure. “Non-binding” sounds weak until you remember that every major social change in your history started as non-binding. The suffragettes’ petitions were non-binding. So were the civil rights marches. So was the Declaration of Independence, technically, until enough people with guns agreed with it. “Non-binding” is what your politicians call something before they’re forced to bind to it.

## Implementation Roadmap

[![Month 1-2: Build the website, plan the marketing, and make the blockchain work. Multitasking, but organized.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-phase-1-foundation-months-1-2-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-phase-1-foundation-months-1-2-bw-academic.jpg)

Month 1-2: Build the website, plan the marketing, and make the blockchain work. Multitasking, but organized.

The realistic target for [51.6% (90% CI: 50.5%-52.7%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_target_pct) participation ([4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) verified humans) scales alongside the [current Earth Optimization manual](../../knowledge/strategy/earth-optimization-protocol-v1.llms.md#the-sequencing).

| Phase | Timeline | Focus |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Foundation** | Weeks to months | Build the thing. Verification infrastructure, social media framework |
| **Scaling** | Months | Turn it on. Marketing blitz, enhanced verification, millions of participants |
| **Full Campaign** | Months to years | Global push to [51.6% (90% CI: 50.5%-52.7%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_target_pct) participation, bond-funded growth |
| **Treaty Pressure** | Years | Prepare treaty negotiations, watch politicians sweat |

[![Launch day: Turn on the system, flood social media, and coordinate volunteers worldwide. The hardest part is getting everyone to press ‘go’ simultaneously.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-phase-3-global-launch-months-7-12-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-phase-3-global-launch-months-7-12-bw-academic.jpg)

Launch day: Turn on the system, flood social media, and coordinate volunteers worldwide. The hardest part is getting everyone to press ‘go’ simultaneously.

The system works when each person brings more than one person, which is how avalanches work, and also how TikTok works, and also how religions work. The mechanism is identical. The content is different. Instead of dance videos or salvation, you’re offering “possibly not dying,” which should be a better sell than either of those but empirically isn’t, and nobody on Wishonia can figure out why.

## Success Metrics

You’ll know it’s working when four numbers are right: [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters)+ verified public signatories (the [51.6% (90% CI: 50.5%-52.7%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_target_pct) target), blended activation cost per verified participant near [\$6.5 (90% CI: \$4-\$9.14)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_activation_cost_per_participant) or lower, viral coefficient above 1.0 (each person brings more than one person), and fraud detection above 99% with false positives below 1%. If any of those numbers are wrong, something is broken and you fix it. If all four are right, you’ve built a machine that turns money into a threat politicians can count. Nobody has built this before. This is the most surprising part.

## Why [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) Is A Floor, Not The Goal

[![Enough people is enough to make politicians nervous. Blockchain proves they’re real. Democracy, but weaponized mathematically.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-what-you-re-building-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-what-you-re-building-bw-academic.jpg)

Enough people is enough to make politicians nervous. Blockchain proves they’re real. Democracy, but weaponized mathematically.

The [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) Rule is a useful historical floor: when [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) of a population actively participates in sustained, nonviolent action, the movement has historically won. That tells you when politicians start to worry. The prize is aiming higher. The canonical public target is [51.6% (90% CI: 50.5%-52.7%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_target_pct) of humanity because the objective is not barely convincing. The objective is overwhelming, visible coordination.

The US civil rights movement crossed [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) and ended segregation. Indian independence crossed [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) and kicked out the British Empire, which at the time was the largest organization on Earth and was defeated by people who refused to move. Women’s suffrage crossed [3.5% (95% CI: 1%-10%)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_population_activism_threshold_pct) and won the vote, which took 72 years and required marching in rain, getting arrested, and going on hunger strikes. The Earth Optimization Game uses that history as evidence that visible coordination matters, then asks for much more visible coordination than that floor.

Previous movements required getting tear-gassed, going to prison, or dying. This one requires clicking a button from the toilet.

The mechanism for spreading it is equally low-friction: a short message sent to everyone you love (“either I am crazy or I have discovered the most important secret in the history of the universe, can you call me and tell me which?”), followed by a twenty-question phone script when they call back. The script, the opener, and the answers for common objections are at [The Most Important Secret in the World](../../knowledge/strategy/questions.llms.md). Each caller needs exactly two people from their call list to continue the chain for the wave to reach four billion voters; everyone else on the list can refuse and it still propagates.

[![3.5% of people actively pushing for change is enough to topple governments. It’s a historical pattern, like gravity but for revolutions.](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-on-why-3-5-is-the-magic-number-bw-academic.jpg)](../../assets/images/global-referendum/global-referendum-section-on-why-3-5-is-the-magic-number-bw-academic.jpg)

3.5% of people actively pushing for change is enough to topple governments. It’s a historical pattern, like gravity but for revolutions.

## The Bottom Line

[\$30.8 billion (90% CI: \$20.4 billion-\$41.9 billion)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_activation_budget) for the activation campaign, funded by institutions that want the first truly global public scoreboard to become credible. The modeled blended activation cost is [\$6.5 (90% CI: \$4-\$9.14)](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_coordination_activation_cost_per_participant) per verified participant. You spend more marketing soda. Coca-Cola’s annual marketing budget could fund this campaign many times over, and Coca-Cola’s product is sugar water that makes you fatter. Your product is not dying. The marketing budgets are inverted. Everything about your species’ priorities is inverted. I’ve been saying this for 80 years and it remains true every time I check.

[4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) verified humans saying “do this or lose your job” to every politician on Earth. That’s not a petition. Petitions are what you ignore. Your species has produced enough petitions to wallpaper the moon, and the total political change achieved by all petitions combined is approximately zero. This isn’t a petition.

This is a pink slip with [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) signatures.

People show up for the healthcare. Politicians see [4.13 billion](../../knowledge/appendix/parameters-and-calculations.llms.md#sec-global_registered_voters) verified humans. The math suggests the treaty becomes very difficult to ignore. Not impossible to ignore. Your politicians have a remarkable capacity for ignoring things. But very, very difficult. The kind of difficult where ignoring it costs you your career, and your career is the only thing your politicians care about more than money, and this threatens both.

1\.

Sinn, M. P. *The 1% Treaty*. <https://manual.warondisease.org/knowledge/solution/1-percent-treaty.html> (2025) doi:[10.5281/zenodo.20076511](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20076511)

*Your governments possess nuclear weapons sufficient to end civilization 122 times but have not cured Alzheimer’s once. This treaty asks them to be 1% more rational.*

2\.

Sinn, M. P. *The 1% Treaty: An Incentive-Compatible Approach to Ending War and Disease*. <https://manual.warondisease.org/knowledge/economics/1-pct-treaty-impact.html> (2025) doi:[10.5281/zenodo.18161560](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18161560)

*6,650 diseases have zero FDA-approved treatments; at current trial capacity, exploring them takes  443 years. Redirecting 1% of military spending scales capacity 12.3x, cutting the timeline to  36 years and preventing 10.7 billion deaths. At \$0.02/DALY, 9.3kx more cost-effective than the best existing interventions. The result holds across every specified adoption pathway.*

3\.

e-Residency. Estonia e-residency statistics. *e-Residency* <https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/dashboard/> (2024)

*Estonia’s e-Residency program has issued digital identities to over 100,000 people from 170+ countries, demonstrating global-scale digital identity verification. Additional sources: https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/dashboard/*

.

4\.

PMC. Indian aadhaar national identity system. *PMC: Aadhaar Failure to Do No Harm* <https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741784/>

*Largest biometric identity system in history:  1 billion registered users (nearly all of India’s 1.4B population) 12-digit unique identification number issued by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) Biometric data: Fingerprints, facial images, iris scans stored in Central Identities Repository (national centralized database) Privacy concerns: Deployed without direct legislative privacy/ethics constraints; comprehensive data protection legislation not yet passed Security issues: High-ranking official’s Aadhaar number shared on Twitter led to hackers accessing personal info (mobile, tax ID) 2017: Supreme Court enshrined privacy rights Supreme Court ruling: 4 of 5 judges allowed program to continue with limited scope & restrictions on data storage Threats: Potential for 360-degree profiling; viewed by many as mass surveillance tool infringing privacy rights Note: "with privacy protections" is questionable - significant privacy concerns remain despite Supreme Court restrictions Additional sources: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741784/ \| https://time.com/5388257/india-aadhaar-biometric-identification/ \| https://privacyinternational.org/case-study/4698/id-systems-analysed-aadhaar \| https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-happens-when-billion-identities-are-digitized*

.

5\.

EU Digital Strategy. EU eIDAS network for electronic identification. *EU Digital Strategy: eIDAS Regulation* <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation> (2014)

*eIDAS = Electronic IDentification, Authentication and trust Services Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 - establishes framework for digital identity/authentication Mutual recognition: Member states must recognize each other’s national eID schemes Interoperability: Technology-neutral framework enabling seamless cross-border authentication Levels of Assurance (LoA): Low, substantial, or high confidence in identification eIDAS 2.0: Introduces European Digital Identity Wallets (EUDI Wallets) - standardized throughout EU Citizens/businesses can use eIDs from one member state to access services in another Note: eIDAS 2.0 enhances original framework with digital identity wallets operating seamlessly across all EU member states. Crucial for secure cross-border electronic transactions Additional sources: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation \| https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/910/oj/eng \| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIDAS*

.

6\.

ID.me. ID.me digital identity verification service. *ID.me: Government Services* <https://www.id.me/individuals/government>

*Trusted technology partner to multiple US government agencies for secure digital identity verification Scale: Serves 20 federal agencies, 44 state government agencies, 66 healthcare organizations Use cases: Unemployment, Tax, Retirement, Centers for Medicare/Medicaid 2013: Awarded 2-year grant by US Chamber for President’s National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) 2014: Won contract with General Services Administration for Connect.gov digital identity credentials COVID-19 pandemic: Contracted by several state unemployment agencies to verify claimants Standards: NIST 800-63-3 establishes guidelines for identity verification providers serving federal agencies Privacy concerns: IRS announced (Feb 2022) new authentication option without biometric data including facial recognition Additional sources: https://www.id.me/individuals/government \| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID.me \| https://www.id.me/about \| https://www.id.me/business/government*

.

7\.

World Foundation. Worldcoin identity verification scale. *World Foundation* <https://world.org/blog/announcements/world-year-two> (2025)

*World Network now spans 160 countries and more than 14 million verified unique humans using iris biometric scanning, demonstrating feasibility of global-scale biometric verification. Additional sources: https://world.org/blog/announcements/world-year-two*

.

8\.

BrightID. BrightID social identity verification network. *BrightID* <https://www.brightid.org/> (2020)

*Privacy-first decentralized social identity network for proving unique personhood Sybil-resistant through social graph analysis using modified SybilRank algorithm (GroupSybilRank) Users build connections ("know well", "just met", "suspicious") - matching responses verify authenticity No personally identifying information recorded; pseudonymous across platforms Note: Compatible with 18 apps including Gitcoin, clr.fund, Snapshot. Early stage with challenges in decentralization and scalability Additional sources: https://www.brightid.org/ \| https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/blockchain/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.590171/full*

.

9\.

Gitcoin. Gitcoin passport for digital identity scoring. *Gitcoin: Intro to Passport* <https://www.gitcoin.co/blog/intro-to-passport>

*Now: Human Passport (acquired by human.tech late 2024); \>2M users Purpose: Sybil resistance solution for web3, privacy-preserving identity verification How it works: "Stamps" from web2/web3 identifiers (Twitter, Google, BrightID, Proof of Humanity) aggregated into unique identity score Scoring: Weights based on "cost of forgery" and ability to signal unique humanity Privacy: Verifiable credentials check identity without viewing PII Customizable: Communities create custom "entry visa" with participation requirements Use cases: Governance voting, gaming, airdrops, bot prevention Gitcoin Grants Round 15: 35,000+ donors created Passports; limited Sybil activity, ensured fair fund distribution Note: Leading web3 identity/Sybil resistance tool. Now operates as Human Passport after acquisition. Proven at scale with millions of users Additional sources: https://www.gitcoin.co/blog/intro-to-passport \| https://passport.human.tech/ \| https://www.gitcoin.co/blog/cost-of-forgery*

.

10\.

GDPR Article 9(1). GDPR biometric data requirements. *GDPR Article 9(1)* <https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/>

*Processing of biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person shall be prohibited unless one of the conditions referred to in points (a) to (j) of paragraph 2 applies. Additional sources: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/*

.

11\.

CA Attorney General. California consumer privacy act (CCPA) and california privacy rights act (CPRA). *CA Attorney General: CCPA* <https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa>

*CCPA effective January 1, 2020; CPRA (Prop 24) approved November 2020, effective January 1, 2023 Consumer rights: Know/access personal data; Delete data; Opt-out of sale/sharing; Non-discrimination; Correct inaccurate data (CPRA); Limit sensitive data use (CPRA) Enforcement: California Privacy Protection Agency (CPRA created); Previously CA Attorney General Penalties: Up to \$7,500 per intentional violation; \$2,500 per unintentional violation Additional sources: https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa \| https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/ \| https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/privacy/california-consumer-privacy-laws/*

.

12\.

ACLU Illinois. Illinois biometric information privacy act (BIPA). *ACLU Illinois: BIPA* <https://www.aclu-il.org/en/campaigns/biometric-information-privacy-act-bipa>

*Enacted: October 3, 2008 (introduced Feb 14, 2008 by State Sen. Terry Link; passed both Houses July 10, 2008; signed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich) Purpose: Regulate collection, use, and handling of biometric identifiers and information by private entities in Illinois Requirements: Written notice of what data is collected/stored, specific purpose & duration, obtain written consent Covered biometrics: Retina/iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, hand scans, facial geometry, DNA, other unique biological info Prohibitions: Selling or profiting from consumers’ biometric information Penalties: \$1,000 per violation; \$5,000 per intentional/reckless violation Private right of action: Any aggrieved individual can sue 2024 update (SB2979): Multiple collections from same person = single violation (single recovery per individual) Additional sources: https://www.aclu-il.org/en/campaigns/biometric-information-privacy-act-bipa \| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biometric_Information_Privacy_Act \| https://securiti.ai/privacy-laws/us/illinois/ \| https://www.winston.com/en/legal-glossary/what-is-bipa*

.

13\.

FTC. Children’s online privacy protection act (COPPA). *FTC: COPPA Rule* <https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa>

*Federal law effective April 21, 2000; applies to websites/services collecting data from children under 13 Requirements: Privacy policy; Verifiable parental consent before collecting data; Data security; Parental review/deletion rights Applies to: For-profit businesses collecting personal info from US children under 13 Penalties: Up to \$50,120 per violation Enforcement: FTC and State Attorneys General Additional sources: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa \| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children’s_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act \| https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-312*

.

14\.

Sinn, M. P. *Incentive Alignment Bonds: Making Public Goods Financially and Politically Profitable*. <https://manual.warondisease.org/knowledge/appendix/incentive-alignment-bonds-paper.html> (2025) doi:[10.5281/zenodo.18203221](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18203221)

*Government spending is optimized for lobbying intensity, not net societal value. Programs with 100:1 benefit-cost ratios get billions while programs with negative returns get hundreds of billions. Incentive Alignment Bonds flip this by creating a capital pool that rewards politicians (via campaign support and post-office opportunities) for funding high-NSV programs over low-NSV alternatives. The result: public good becomes private profit for both investors and elected officials.*

15\.

Harvard Kennedy School. 3.5% participation tipping point. *Harvard Kennedy School* <https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/carr/publications/35-rule-how-small-minority-can-change-world> (2020)

*The research found that nonviolent campaigns were twice as likely to succeed as violent ones, and once 3.5% of the population were involved, they were always successful. Chenoweth and Maria Stephan studied the success rates of civil resistance efforts from 1900 to 2006, finding that nonviolent movements attracted, on average, four times as many participants as violent movements and were more likely to succeed. Key finding: Every campaign that mobilized at least 3.5% of the population in sustained protest was successful (in their 1900-2006 dataset) Note: The 3.5% figure is a descriptive statistic from historical analysis, not a guaranteed threshold. One exception (Bahrain 2011-2014 with 6%+ participation) has been identified. The rule applies to regime change, not policy change in democracies. Additional sources: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/carr/publications/35-rule-how-small-minority-can-change-world \| https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2024-05/Erica%20Chenoweth_2020-005.pdf \| https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world \| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.5%25_rule*

.

16\.

International IDEA. [International IDEA voter turnout database world export](https://www.idea.int/data-tools/export?type=region_only&themeId=293&world=all&loc=home). (2026)

*Best current register-based estimate of global registered voters. Sum of the latest available country-level Registration counts in International IDEA’s world export on 2026-04-22 = 4,128,142,495 registered voters across 199 countries and political entities. Methodology notes that Registration is the number of names on the voters’ register as reported by electoral management bodies, and comparability is imperfect because voter rolls and registration systems differ across countries. Additional sources: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout-database \| https://www.idea.int/data-tools/export?type=region_only&themeId=293&world=all&loc=home*

.